posted
R tape is a pretty good product. I just went back to some of their tape because of poor quality of others. A Speed Press might be a good option for all those banners too.
------------------ Wright Signs Wyandotte, Michigan Since 1978 www.wrightsigns.outputto.com All change isn't progress, and all progress isn't forward.
[This message has been edited by David Wright (edited August 03, 2001).]
Posts: 2785 | From: Wyandotte, MI USA | Registered: Jan 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think David may have the right idea for this job. A Speed Press would certainly be a time saver on that many banners, and the cost of transfer tape would be much less.
posted
Mac Tac is who I think once advertised that their tape was reusable for eight or ten applications. There might be several tapes that can do that. To have a reusable tape and a speed press, might be the winning combination.
------------------ The SignShop Mendocino, California "Where the Redwoods meet the Surf"
Posts: 6718 | From: Mendocino, CA. USA | Registered: Nov 1998
| IP: Logged |
Unfortunately, each banner has a 28" x 28" logo. Neither speed press will handle it. The graphics department is doing a great job by "hinging" them.
I just want to be sure I have the best tape in their hands, to make the job as painless as possible. They seem to like the conform series a little better than the clear.
Incidentally, these banners will hang in gymnasiums for years to come. Is there anything we should do to prolong adhesion?
While we make a lot of signs and banners, they are still pretty low on our ladder of expertise. I feel better checking with the experts.
Printer-friendly view of this topic