Letterville Bull Board Letterville | Bull Board
 


 

Front Page
A Letterhead History
About Us
Become A Resident
Edit Your Database Info
Find A Letterhead

Letterville Merchants
Resident Downloads
Letterville BookShop
Future Live Meets
Past Meets
Step-By-Steps
Past Panel Swaps
Past SOTM
Letterhead Profiles
Business Cards
Become A Merchant

Click on the button
below to chat with other
Letterville users.

http://www.letterville.com/ubb/chaticon.gif

Steve & Barb Shortreed
144 Hill St., E.
Fergus, ON, Canada
N1M 1G9

Phone: 519-787-2892
Fax: 519-787-2673
Email: barb@letterville.com

Copyright ©1995-2008
The Letterhead Website

 

 

The Letterville BullBoard   
my profile login | search | faq | calendar | im | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» The Letterville BullBoard » Old Archives » readability: distance/velocity

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: readability: distance/velocity
Wayne Webb
Resident


Member # 1124

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wayne Webb   Author's Homepage   Email Wayne Webb   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Spraying on primer today, waiting on coats to dry... goofing off.

If a vehicle is traveling at 10 mph, it covers 14.66666...ft per second right?

If there is allowed 5 seconds to read a sign, that would translate to 73.333...ft traveled in a 5 second span @ 10mph.

Therefore, you would need copy which can be read, by the average person, at 73.333 ft away, if traveling at 10mph, as he/she will only have 5 seconds or 73.333 ft before passing the sign.

20mph 146.666'
30mph 220'
40mph 293.333'
50mph 366.666'
65mph 476.666'

Using one of the distance/readability charts, could this be used to help a customer decide what size of sign he needs based on the average speed of the traffic passing his proposed sign?

--------------------
Wayne Webb
Webb Signworks
Chipley, FL
850.638.9329
wayne@webbsignworks.com

Posts: 7404 | From: Chipley,Florida,United States | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mark Matyjakowski
Visitor
Member # 294

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mark Matyjakowski   Author's Homepage   Email Mark Matyjakowski   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The USSC has done the research on this ... I guess ... I'm not a member so I haven't seen it.
Available here...
http://www.ussc.org/publications.html

--------------------
Compulsive, Neurotic, Anti-social and Paranoid ... but basically Happy

Posts: 2677 | From: Rochester, NY, USA | Registered: Nov 1998  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wayne Webb
Resident


Member # 1124

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wayne Webb   Author's Homepage   Email Wayne Webb   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Mark,
That would be interesting reading.

What prompted me to wonder about this was a recent job.
The customer( a municipality) had some 4'x8' signs but wanted sandblasted HDU ones and wanted them smaller.
They specified 3'x5' so I sent them two designs: one 3x5 and the other 48''x45''which I told them was the same square footage. The 3x5 was just copy and the 48x45 has a silhoutte graphic on it, and a fancy shape. It pretty much had to be close to those dimensions to accomodate the graphic. When I gave them the prices, they went for the 48x45 and told me that was all they were budgeted for. So I made the signs. Meanwhile, sometime after I started production, I noticed this humongous landscaping had been placed where the signs were to be located. Til then I had not even been told where they would be installed. Seems another department had gotten an engineering firm to design the landscaping etc. and were counting on a much larger sign. The lady from the 'sign committee, who ordered the sign, then came to me and wanted to fuss about the size of the sign. I told her that it would have helped me finacially and that I would have been glad to make her a bigger sign.

I was just looking for a way to prevent this scenario from happening again.

--------------------
Wayne Webb
Webb Signworks
Chipley, FL
850.638.9329
wayne@webbsignworks.com

Posts: 7404 | From: Chipley,Florida,United States | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bill Cosharek
Resident


Member # 1274

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bill Cosharek   Email Bill Cosharek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wayne,

Since this is for future reference, then we can speak freely here, right? I think there are more things to consider here besides how long it takes
someone driving by to read a message on a sign in say 5 seconds. I haven't read the articles by the USSC but if anything here is in there, that's purely coincidental.

Sign size isn't going to make it instantly readable. And not all copy has to be read from the same distance. What I mean is that while the main message can be read from a greater distance, if the sign is pleasingly attractive, then that will hold someone's attention until they drive closer in approach to read the finer print. Our job as sign designers is to use what we know of
layout design and color theories to make that happen; without causing traffic distractions.

The initial shape of the sign (its perimeter) will be the first thing seen by an approaching motorist. Will the shape capture their attention or will it blend in with the rest of the clutter? I know that code restrictions can play
havoc with intended designs (& some codes are really stupid), but work-arounds can usually be found. That may not apply here but thought I'd mention it anyway.

That was a good observation about the driving distance covered per second. Yes, that should help, but don't forget about design theories which lead the viewer through the intended message as effectively as possible.

As for the size discrepancy between what you were told by the committee and what the engineering firm did, it would seem you already know the answer; learned by this experience. Get all the facts first.


Now go eat! BURP! (excuse me)

--------------------
Bill Cosharek
Bill Cosharek Signs
N.Huntingdon,Pa

bcosharek@juno.com

Posts: 703 | From: N.Huntingdon, Pa, USA | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Camille
Visitor
Member # 501

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Camille         Edit/Delete Post 
A while back I heard (and I forget where) that you get 10ft of visibility for every inch of letter - that is if you're moving. Did anyone else here of this?

--------------------
signs

Posts: 535 | From: pa | Registered: Dec 1998  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PKing
Deceased


Member # 337

Icon 10 posted      Profile for PKing         Edit/Delete Post 
Bill is right on with the keeping to design basics
as the MOST important factor about readability.
Distance and speed is just part of the factors.
Color,letter style,reversing panels,etc.are to be included in the formula!
Spacing between letters,use of the negative space
What if you are a poor reader?
Color blind?

[ November 27, 2003, 08:29 PM: Message edited by: PKing ]

--------------------
PKing is
Pat King
The Professor of
SIGNOLOGY

Posts: 3113 | From: Pompano Beach, FL. USA | Registered: Nov 1998  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Letterville. A Community Of Letterheads & Pinheads!

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Search For Sign Supplies
Category:
 

                  

Letterhead Suppliers Around the World