The one on the bottom is what I had worked up last time we discussed this. The one's above it are what I played with last night.
The third one uses the same color scheme I have now.
Comments and critiques welcome.
[ July 26, 2008, 03:05 PM: Message edited by: Glenn Taylor ]
Posted by Michael Gene Adkins (Member # 882) on :
fourth and fifth one down from the top
I dunno why--it just looks cool
Posted by Arthur Vanson (Member # 2855) on :
Fourth one down for me, Glen. I think I would prefer the i dot to be solid red rather than a repeat of the globe at the logo size shown, though I'm sure it looks great at t-shirt size.
(edited as I've just learned to count – from one to four, at least)
[ July 27, 2008, 10:31 AM: Message edited by: Arthur Vanson ]
Posted by Todd Gill (Member # 2569) on :
Glenn - still liking the strong appeal and simpler look of the bottom one.
Although, the one next to the bottom isn't bad - maybe a little more definition on the upper half of the "C"....it kinda bleeds away too much.
Posted by Chris OBrien (Member # 5409) on :
I still like the bottom one the best. Not too over-complicated. The orange wave(?) design reminds me of the firefox logo, and the blue and green wave design reminds me a lot of the old Fleet Bank logo (who was bought out by Bank of America.) Plus the more simple version will translate better to other applications (like 1 color shirts, etc.) Just my thoughts.
Posted by John Deaton (Member # 925) on :
I like the new ones. Not for sure if I like the red or the green. They both have appeal to me. The original one, though very good, I just dont like that big cg on the icon. You already have Creative Graphics spelled out, I dont see the need for the initials. I did this before on my own logos, but never was pleased with it. The new ones have more impact, at least for me.
Posted by Kelly Thorson (Member # 2958) on :
I went to your web site to see what type of work you did. (great stuff there) To me the first version of the logo speaks the strongest to me of the style of work portrayed there. It was interesting though because there were some signs with a stlye that ties in really nicely with the bottom versions as well. I find the top versions more "refined" and the bottom versions more "in your face".
Posted by Pam Edmunds (Member # 9109) on :
wow those look awesome!!! I like the 4th and 5th ones down from the top! Love them!!
Posted by Amy Brown (Member # 1963) on :
1-5. I never did like the CG versions. Looks too elementary for what you do. I like your current logo!!! Posted by Rusty Bradley (Member # 6938) on :
4 and 5
Posted by Raymond Chapman (Member # 361) on :
Needs some Brush Script.
Four and five for me, too.
Posted by Ian Stewart-Koster (Member # 3500) on :
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
To me the first version of the logo speaks the strongest to me of the style of work portrayed there. It was interesting though because there were some signs with a stlye that ties in really nicely with the bottom versions as well. I find the top versions more "refined" and the bottom versions more "in your face".
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)