Missed it Glenn...go to my link...transparent al.does not exist...
[ February 27, 2002, 08:28 PM: Message edited by: J & N Signs ]
Posted by Glenn Taylor (Member # 162) on :
Here ya go....
Posted by J & N Signs (Member # 901) on :
You still don't get it Glenn! Go to "Click here to read the corrected version...explains everything..or am I missing the joke from the beginning...hehehee
[ February 27, 2002, 08:39 PM: Message edited by: J & N Signs ]
Posted by Mike Pipes (Member # 1573) on :
I must be missin the joke too cause the first thing I read was "THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CORRECTED! CLICK HERE TO READ THE CORRECTION !!! THERE ISN'T TRANSPARENT ALUMINUM AFTER ALL !!!"
It's not aluminium, it's aluminium oxide.
Posted by Robb Lowe (Member # 2121) on :
THis is what we in the south call a "sh*t and fell back in it" faux pas. (fo-paw, not fox pass)
Hey, it LOOKED authentic, and their reasoning for the creation of such a material made sense to me.
Still and all, an amazing discovery even if it is a ceramic versus a metal.
As a friend of mine in California says when he sends an email and forgets to attach the file,
"I've got a case of premature publication"
[ February 28, 2002, 05:27 PM: Message edited by: Robb Lowe ]
Posted by Glenn Taylor (Member # 162) on :
Sorry Fergie.....I misunderstood your statement. I thought you were saying that the article didn't exist and that you couldn't bring it up.